WSU study sees decline in support for plant breeding programs

For the Basin Business Journal | September 19, 2020 1:00 AM

A team of scientists led by Kate Evans, a Washington State University horticulture professor who leads WSU’s apple and pear breeding program, found that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is spending less on public plant breeding programs.

The study was published in the journal Crop Science.

Evans and her colleagues conducted a survey of 278 plant breeding programs around the country. Public programs are chiefly federal programs, like those run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or based at public research universities.

In the surveys, respondents estimated a 21.4% decline in full time employee (FTE) time for program leaders over the past five years and an estimated 17.7% decline in FTE time for technical support personnel.

The researchers also found that retirement looms for a significant number of plant breeding program leaders. Over a third of the responding programs reported having leaders over the age of 60 and 62% are led by people over 50.

This decline is concerning because plant breeding has a direct impact on food security, Evans said.

“Plant breeding plays a fundamental part of the long-term food security of this country,” Evans said. “The tremendous increases in food production over the past century are largely due to plant breeding, and the world’s population is only increasing.”

According to Evans, the focus on food security has received more attention in the last few months, as the COVID-19 pandemic has spread around the world.

“Plant breeding is a long-term, sustainable way to address concerns over having enough food and keeping our food sources secure,” said Evans, who is based at WSU’s Tree Fruit Research & Extension Center in Wenatchee.

Plant breeding takes on many forms, such as breeding disease tolerance, increasing production, introducing new delicious varieties, or improving drought tolerance.

“It could be a disease, a pest, climate change, any number of things,” Evans said. “We do not live in a stable environment, and there are many different ways to deal with that.”

Plant pathogens, like bacteria, and pests are always adapting, so varieties of crops that were bred to fight off a disease naturally start to lose their defenses. Plant breeding programs help growers stay ahead of those potentially harmful adaptations.

Another impact of declining breeding programs is losing those with a local focus.

“In Washington, for example, our cereal breeding programs are very focused on local production,” Evans said. “They breed wheat that grows very well for Eastern Washington.”

Another example is the citrus industry. Citrus greening disease has been devastating to growers, particularly in Florida, when trees produce bitter, green and misshapen fruit. Plant breeding programs are working hard to develop varieties that naturally repel the pest that causes the problems.

One reason that plant breeding programs are declining is expense. It takes many years to develop a new variety of a crop, Evans said. And funding a program for that long requires significant investment.

“We can’t rely on grants because those are often only for a few years,” she said. “You can’t do anything in plant breeding in three years; it requires long-term sustained funding to get a program going.”

Evans’ co-authors on the paper are Michael Coe, Cedar Lake Research Group, Ksenija Gasic, Clemson University, and Dorrie Main, WSU Department of Horticulture.

The study was funded by grants from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the National Science Foundation and the National Association of Plant Breeders.